Following is an outline of some of the most important statutes and acts that apply to employees in California. These laws are important as they lay the groundwork for the rights that employees have in the workplace.
​
​
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”)
(42 USC §§2000e—2000e–17)
Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It also prohibits retaliation against an employee for opposing any practice that violates Title VII or for making a charge or participating in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing under Title VII. Title VII also prohibits harassment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
In California, claims must be initially filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within three hundred days (other jurisdictions it may be as little as one hundred-eighty days). Once the EEOC issues a Right to Sue Notice, the claimant has ninety days to file a case in court.
​
Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”)
(Government Code §§12900–12996)
FEHA is a catch all behemoth of a California state law that provides several protections to employees under one giant umbrella. These protections cover most of the federal protections mentioned earlier, in addition to even greater protection. Basically, under FEHA, an employer cannot discriminate in important employment decision based on the target employee’s race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age (at least 40), sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Furthermore, an employer may be liable for workplace harassment.
​
Claims must be initially filed with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing within one year of the discrimination/harassment/retaliation. Once the DFEH issues a Right to Sue Notice, the claimant has one year to file a case in court.
Call us at (619) 800-4214 to set up a
FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION.
​
Submit the form below for a FREE LEGAL EVALUATION of your case.
Do not submit any confidential information. Attorney-client will not be formed unless all parties sign a legal services agreement. By clicking the "Submit" button you are acknowledging and agreeing to our disclaimer.
Sexual Harassment under FEHA and Title VII
The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Govt. Code §§12900–12996) contains an express prohibition against sexual harassment. Under FEHA, it is an unlawful employment practice to harass an employee, job applicant, or independent contractor because of "sex," which is defined as including sexual harassment. FEHA also provides that an individual harasser may be personally liable for sexual harassment under FEHA.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC §§2000e—2000e–17) does not explicitly prohibit workplace sexual harassment. However, Title VII's prohibition against discrimination based on "sex" (42 USC §2000e–2(a)(1)) has been construed to include sexual harassment when the harassment is "sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim's employment and create an abusive working environment.
Both California and federal law have traditionally viewed sexual harassment cases as taking one of two forms:
1) Quid pro quo harassment, which occurs when an employment benefit (such as being hired or promoted) or the absence of a job detriment (such as being demoted or terminated) is conditioned, expressly or impliedly, on the submission to unwelcome sexual conduct. This type of harassment is sometimes referred to as "tangible employment action" harassment.
2) Hostile environment harassment, which occurs when the plaintiff's work environment is made hostile or abusive by sexual conduct.
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
(42 USC §§12101–12213)
Certain employers are prohibited by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) from discriminating against qualified individuals on the basis of disability in any aspect of the employment relationship, including specifically
​
Job application procedures; Hiring; Advancement; Discharge; Compensation; Job training; and Any other terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.
A “qualified individual” is an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that the individual holds or desires.
A “disability” under the ADA is defined as any of the following: 1) A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities. 2) A record of such an impairment. 3) Being regarded as having such an impairment.
An employer must make “reasonable accommodation” for individuals with known disabilities, unless it can demonstrate that doing so would be an undue hardship on its business operations.
​
In California, claims must be initially filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within three hundred days (other jurisdictions it may be as little as one hundred-eighty days). Once the EEOC issues a Right to Sue Notice, the claimant has ninety days to file a case in court.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”)
(29 USC §§621–634)
ADEA prohibits employers from discriminating against employees 40 years old or older on the basis of age in hiring, promoting, pay, or termination. The ADEA does not cover people younger than 40.
In California, claims must be initially filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within three hundred days (other jurisdictions it may be as little as one hundred-eighty days). Once the EEOC issues a Right to Sue Notice, the claimant has ninety days to file a case in court.
California Wage Hour and PAGA Claims
Following is a list of important Labor Code sections that are referred to Wage Hour laws in California. These rights a given to certain non-exempt employees.
Overtime Laws
(Labor Code §510)
Labor Code §510 provides that any work done by an employee in excess of 8 hours in 1 workday must be compensated at a rate of no less than one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay.
-
works more than 8 hours in a day (paid at time and a half)
-
works more than 40 hours in a workweek (paid at time and a half)
-
works more than 12 hours in a day (paid at double time), and
-
works on the seventh consecutive day in a workweek (paid at time and a half for the first eight hours; paid at double time for all hours beyond that).
Meal Break Violations: Labor Code
Labor Code §512(a)–(b)
Meal periods of at least 30 minutes must ordinarily be provided within the first 5 hours of an employee’s shift. See Labor Code §512(a)–(b) (IWC may authorize 6-hour period). An employer may not employ an employee for a work period of more than 10 hours per day without providing the employee with a second meal period of not less than 30 minutes. Unless the employee is relieved of all duty during a 30-minute meal period, the meal period is “on duty” and counted as time worked. (See Brinker Restaurant Corp. v Superior Court (2012) 53 C4th 1004.)
-
1 meal break for first 5 hours of work
-
2 Meal breaks for more than 10 hours
Employers that fail to provide an employee a meal period must pay the employee 1 hour’s pay at the regular rate of pay for each day that any number of meal periods is not provided.
Rest Period Violations
Employees must be authorized and permitted to take 10 minutes’ rest for shifts from 3.5 to 6 hours in length; 20 minutes for shifts of more than 6 hours up to 10 hours; 30 minutes for shifts of more than 10 hours up to 14 hours; and so on.
-
1 (10 minute) break - 3.5 to 6 hours in length
-
20 minutes – 6 to 10 hours
-
30 minutes – 10 – 14 hours
If an employer fails to provide an employee rest breaks in accordance with an applicable wage order, it must pay the employee 1 hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of pay for each workday that one or more rest periods are not provided.
Payroll Statement Violations
(Labor Code §226)
Employers must provide each employee with an itemized written statement (semimonthly or at the time of each payment of wages) showing the following (Labor Code §226(a)(1)–(9)):
-
Gross wages earned;
-
Total hours worked by each employee;
-
The number of piece-rate units earned and any applicable piece rate if paid on a piece-rate basis;
-
All deductions;
-
Net wages earned;
-
Inclusive dates of the period for which the employee is paid;
-
The name of the employee and the last four digits of his or her Social Security number (or employee identification number);
-
The employer’s name and address; and
-
All applicable hourly rates in effect during the pay period and the corresponding number of hours worked at each hourly rate by the employee.
An employee suffering injury as a result of an employer’s failure to comply with these requirements may recover the greater of all actual damages or $50 for the initial pay period and $100 per employee for each violation in a subsequent pay period, not exceeding an aggregate penalty of $4000, plus costs and reasonable attorney fees. Labor Code §226(e)(1).
Failure to Reimburse Business Expenses
(Labor Code §2802)
“An employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties.” Labor Code §2802 requires employers to reimburse their employees for all expenses necessarily incurred in the course and scope of their employment. The types of expenses that should be reimbursed when necessarily incurred include air travel, hotels, motels, meals, cab fare, rental vehicles, and the costs associated with operating a personal vehicle for business purposes.
Workers have the right to be treated fairly in the workplace.
Federal and state laws exist to protect employee's rights. Yet every day, employees somewhere in California are illegally discriminated against, sexually harassed, forced to work unpaid overtime or wrongfully fired.
Illegal biases and discrimination play a role in terminating some groups of employees before others when layoffs become necessary. This type of discrimination usually happens on the basis of race, gender, religion, disability, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity national origin or age.
Some employers cut corners to squeeze more work from employees. An increasing number of employees are finding themselves working longer hours for no additional pay. This is affecting many types of professional employees, as well as hourly workers. Employers are misclassifying employees to avoid paying them overtime. They are misclassifying contractors to avoid paying benefits and taxes.
If you feel you’ve been the victim of unfair employment practices, discrimination, or harassment, in San Diego, NOA Law has the experience and expertise to help you with your case. Whether a client fears a potential job loss, has been wrongfully terminated, suffered discrimination, harassment or needs a trial attorney in an employment matter, he or she can turn to NOA Law.
Contact our San Diego Employment Law Firm.
NOA Law can help you while you are still employed. We work to preserve your employment when possible, or to get justice for you in court if you have been wrongly fired. You have a right to be treated fairly and paid for your work. It is important to speak to an experienced employment law attorney as soon as possible if you believe your rights as an employee have been violated.
San Diego employment discrimination attorney Ahmed has abundant experience practicing in labor and employment law and has dedicated himself to fighting for the rights of the working class. NOA Law offers a free, no obligation consultation to discuss your case. In addition we take your employment discrimination cases on a contingency basis, meaning you don't pay any attorney's fees unless we win your case.